<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Automation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/2007/08/07/on-automation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/2007/08/07/on-automation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:33:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: It Will Be What You Make Of It @ M@Blog</title>
		<link>http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/2007/08/07/on-automation/comment-page-1/#comment-18222</link>
		<dc:creator>It Will Be What You Make Of It @ M@Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/?p=108#comment-18222</guid>
		<description>[...] As a consultant who frequently advises clients on hiring and vets candidates, there is a singular person who I love to see: The person in a forgivably-undervalued position, who is a sponge for learning, and takes it upon themselves to keep learning and playing and building their technology portfolio and skills, who wants to step up and take a swing at the next level. No whining that &#8220;my previous employments haven&#8217;t given me the opportunity to do X&#8221; or &#8220;at my last job we were all Z, so I never had a chance to play with Y&#8221;. I want to hear &#8220;My job isn&#8217;t challenging, I&#8217;ve been doing X and Y nights and weekends and really would like a shot applying what I&#8217;ve grown from a hobby&#8221;. THAT&#8217;S the difference between someone who gets &#8220;dead ended&#8221; and someone who doesn&#8217;t, regardless of their industry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a consultant who frequently advises clients on hiring and vets candidates, there is a singular person who I love to see: The person in a forgivably-undervalued position, who is a sponge for learning, and takes it upon themselves to keep learning and playing and building their technology portfolio and skills, who wants to step up and take a swing at the next level. No whining that &#8220;my previous employments haven&#8217;t given me the opportunity to do X&#8221; or &#8220;at my last job we were all Z, so I never had a chance to play with Y&#8221;. I want to hear &#8220;My job isn&#8217;t challenging, I&#8217;ve been doing X and Y nights and weekends and really would like a shot applying what I&#8217;ve grown from a hobby&#8221;. THAT&#8217;S the difference between someone who gets &#8220;dead ended&#8221; and someone who doesn&#8217;t, regardless of their industry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Librarians as System Administrators @ M@Blog</title>
		<link>http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/2007/08/07/on-automation/comment-page-1/#comment-16548</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Librarians as System Administrators @ M@Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/?p=108#comment-16548</guid>
		<description>[...] best for their userbase. They usually aren&#8217;t sticklers for 9-to-5. They generally embrace automating mundane things because they&#8217;re generally lazy. Wait&#8230; don&#8217;t hate me yet: Lazy is good. Lazy means [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] best for their userbase. They usually aren&#8217;t sticklers for 9-to-5. They generally embrace automating mundane things because they&#8217;re generally lazy. Wait&#8230; don&#8217;t hate me yet: Lazy is good. Lazy means [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/2007/08/07/on-automation/comment-page-1/#comment-5168</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/blog/?p=108#comment-5168</guid>
		<description>Nicely said. Being somewhat obsessive compulsive when it comes to organization, automation is the natural compliment to the way I &quot;think&quot; too. You&#039;re RIGHT on the money about continually learning, adapting, and being willing to try new tasks and responsibilities or you&#039;ll find yourself obsolete pretty damn quick. Some people just don&#039;t like change, and while there is some merit in saying &quot;change for the sake of change is bad&quot;, resisting change where it makes things better, structured, efficient, and automated is &quot;good.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely said. Being somewhat obsessive compulsive when it comes to organization, automation is the natural compliment to the way I &#8220;think&#8221; too. You&#8217;re RIGHT on the money about continually learning, adapting, and being willing to try new tasks and responsibilities or you&#8217;ll find yourself obsolete pretty damn quick. Some people just don&#8217;t like change, and while there is some merit in saying &#8220;change for the sake of change is bad&#8221;, resisting change where it makes things better, structured, efficient, and automated is &#8220;good.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
